A Model Stuck in the Past


The addiction treatment industry is one of the few major health sectors that still looks, feels, and operates much as it did decades ago. Despite major advances in medicine, neuroscience, and behavioral science, most treatment institutions remain largely reactive and anchored in legacy models of care. The treatment model was built around short-term acute episodes of care rather than long-term recovery ecosystems.

Mission

To inform and influence addiction treatment and care using strategic foresight to guide healthcare systems, policymakers, communities, families, and individuals toward more effective treatment outcomes

Vision Statement

To be the leading voice in addiction recovery futures - delivering critical insights that help shape smarter policies, practices, and possibilities for better outcomes.

Substance use disorder (SUD) represents a multidimensional social and health crisis that continues to evolve in complexity and scale. In the United States alone, tens of thousands of individuals die annually from drug overdoses, and millions more experience chronic relapse cycles. Despite enormous public and private investment, treatment outcomes remain flat and inconsistent. A significant reason for this stagnation lies in the field’s short-term, crisis-centered orientation. The majority of treatment infrastructures remain bound to 20th-century paradigms: inpatient rehabilitation, abstinence-only frameworks, and episodic care models. Funding and insurance mechanisms reinforce short-term interventions, while fragmented data systems impede longitudinal learning. Over the past 2 decades, research has made it clear that addiction is a long-term condition, not a short-term problem that can be fixed in one episode of treatment. Many people struggle with relapse and ongoing challenges for years, even after getting help. Most treatment still occurs only after a crisis and focuses on short-term stabilization within programs that end quickly. Once people leave treatment, they often receive little follow-up care or ongoing support. Because of this, today’s crisis-based treatment system does not match nor provide the long-term needs for sustained recovery.

Why the Addiction Treatment Industry Needs Foresight

Most addiction treatment systems respond to problems such as new substances, shifting insurance policy coverages, or cultural and political trends as they emerge rather than anticipating and preparing for them. Strategic foresight offers a pathway to address these limitations by helping stakeholders explore plausible futures, assess emerging risks and opportunities, and design proactive strategies. Project uptick explores the future of treatment through a structured foresight framework, with the goal of informing more humane, effective, and novel approaches to addiction care. This initiative aims to identify emerging signals, develop future scenarios, and generate actionable insights to shape policy, investment, and innovation in the coming years.

Stakeholders

Healthcare providers

pharmaceutical companies

Academic & research institutions

policy think tanks & advocacy groups

Government agencies

biotech companies

Community & peer support organizations

Research Focus

  1. Standardization and reliability of treatment outcome metrics

  2. Definition and standardization of “successful” outcomes

  3. Changes of stigmatization in society regarding addiction

  4. Shifts towards harm reduction

  5. Insurance coverage and Medicaid reforms

  6. AI diagnosing/counseling

  7. Novel medical interventions

  8. Access to treatment

  9. Evolving processes of the “continuum of care”

  10. Government funding and policy shifts

  11. Peer/Community-based recovery models

  12. Psychedelics role in recovery

  13. Novel mutual aid programs of recovery

Next
Next

Cultivated Meat